Arizona Child Custody

We provide honest communication about what parents can reasonably expect in child custody disputes to prepare parties for realistic outcomes. 


Arizona Child Custody Lawyers

When you’re facing a custody case, the first question is almost always, “What’s going to happen with my kids?” Our Arizona child custody lawyers give clients the most important thing to know first: Arizona judges decide custody based on your child’s best interests, using specific factors written into state law (A.R.S. § 25-403).  In most cases, the court will try to ensure both parents have a meaningful role in their children’s lives, assuming it is in their best interest. Our job is to show you how those factors apply to your family and then protect your relationship with your children through an agreement where possible and in court when necessary.

Medina Family Law Associates represents parents in Peoria, Phoenix, Glendale, and throughout Maricopa County, and takes cases statewide. We also offer payment plans for parents who need legal financing.

What “Custody” Means Under Arizona Law: Legal Decision-Making and Parenting Time

Arizona does not use the term “custody” in its family law statutes. Most parents still search for “custody,” but the law now divides it into two separate parts (A.R.S. § 25-401):
  1. Legal decision-making (formerly “legal custody”): the authority to make major decisions about your child’s education, health care, religious upbringing, and personal care. It can be joint (shared by both parents) or sole (held by one parent).
  2. Parenting time (formerly “physical custody” or “visitation”): the schedule that sets when each parent is responsible for the child.

The court decides these two parts separately. Parents can share joint legal decision-making on a parenting time schedule that isn’t 50/50, and a parent with sole legal decision-making still usually has parenting time with the child. Once you understand that distinction, it’s much easier to see what is really at stake in your case and where there’s room to negotiate.

How Arizona Courts Decide Child Custody: The Best-Interests Factors

Arizona’s public policy is that, absent evidence to the contrary, children benefit from substantial, frequent, meaningful, and continuing parenting time with both parents (A.R.S. § 25-103(B)). That policy gives way when domestic violence is found (see below), and even in other cases it isn’t an automatic 50/50 split. The judge has to weigh the factors listed in A.R.S. § 25-403(A), including:

  • The past, present, and potential future relationship between each parent and the child
  • The child’s relationships with parents, siblings, and other important people
  • How well the child is adjusted to home, school, and community
  • The child’s wishes, if the child is of suitable age and maturity
  • The mental and physical health of everyone involved
  • Which parent is more likely to allow frequent, meaningful, and continuing contact with the other parent
  • Whether either parent intentionally misled the court to cause delay, increase costs, or gain an advantage
  • Whether there has been domestic violence or child abuse
  • Whether either parent used coercion or duress to obtain an agreement
  • Whether both parents completed the required parent education program
  • Whether either parent was convicted of falsely reporting child abuse or neglect

The court may not favor a parent because of that parent’s gender or the child’s gender (A.R.S. § 25-403.01(A)). In a contested case, the judge must make specific findings on the record explaining how the relevant factors apply (A.R.S. § 25-403(B)). Those findings are why preparation and evidence matter so much.


When Domestic Violence Is Involved: Arizona’s Alec and Lydia Act

Arizona rewrote its domestic violence custody law in 2026. The Alec and Lydia Act (HB 2995), signed on June 22, 2026, and effective immediately, replaces A.R.S. § 25-403.03 with a new framework built around one principle: the safety of the child and the victimized parent comes first. If domestic violence is part of your family’s story, here’s what the law now says.

  • Coercive control counts as domestic violence. Domestic violence now includes a pattern of coercive control even when there’s no physical violence. That includes threats, isolating a parent from family and friends, monitoring or controlling finances, surveillance, harassment, and using the court process itself as a weapon (A.R.S. § 25-403.03(M)).
  • A finding of domestic violence triggers a presumption. If the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that a parent committed domestic violence, it must presume that giving that parent legal decision-making or parenting time is contrary to the child’s best interests (A.R.S. § 25-403.03(D)). The victim’s testimony can be enough on its own, because corroboration isn’t required. The victim also doesn’t have to prove the abuse was “significant,” a requirement under the old law.
  • The burden shifts to the parent who committed the violence. To overcome the presumption and receive legal decision-making or unsupervised parenting time, that parent must present clear and convincing evidence. A certificate from a batterer’s intervention program isn’t enough on its own. The parent must also show that the program fit the violence involved, waive privilege over the treatment records, and demonstrate a real understanding of how the conduct harmed the child and the other parent.
  • Safety measures are required even when the presumption is overcome. The court must still impose at least one protective measure, such as supervised parenting time or protected exchanges. The victimized parent can’t be made the supervisor. Neither the victim nor the child can be ordered into counseling or an assessment together with the parent who committed the violence.
  • “Mutual” violence is narrowly defined. When both parents are accused, the presumption generally applies to the parent whose conduct was more serious, unless the violence was truly mutual.
  • Written findings are required at every stage. That includes temporary orders (A.R.S. § 25-404), and the presumption carries into later modification cases (A.R.S. § 25-411).

The Act is new, and courts are still working through open questions, including whether it applies to cases filed before June 22, 2026.

Substance abuse is addressed separately. A.R.S. § 25-403.04 creates a rebuttable presumption against awarding legal decision-making to a parent with a recent drug-related conviction or a DUI conviction within the past five years. If you need protection right away, we can also help you pursue an Order of Protection alongside your custody case.

Maricopa County Child Custody Cases: A Step-by-Step Guide

  1. Confirm Arizona has jurisdiction. Under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act, Arizona generally decides custody if it is the child’s “home state,” meaning the child lived here for at least six consecutive months right before the case was filed (A.R.S. § 25-1031). If you or your child recently moved, this is the first thing to check.
  2. File the right petition. Married parents file a Petition for Dissolution of Marriage with children. Unmarried parents typically file a Petition to Establish Legal Decision-Making, Parenting Time, and Child Support, which may also require establishing paternity. Parents with an existing order file a Petition to Modify. You can file at any Maricopa County Superior Court location, including downtown Phoenix, the Northwest Regional Court Center in Surprise, the Northeast Regional Court Center in Phoenix, and the Southeast facility in Mesa.
  3. Serve the other parent. The other parent must be formally served with the paperwork. They generally have 20 days to respond if served in Arizona, or 30 days if served out of state.
  4. Request temporary orders if needed. A custody case can take months. If you need a parenting schedule, decision-making authority, or child support in the meantime, we can ask the court for temporary orders (A.R.S. § 25-404).
  5. Complete the Parent Information Program. Both parents are required to complete a court-approved parent education class (A.R.S. § 25-352) and file proof that they did. We recommend finishing it early so it never delays your case.
  6. Attend the early conference with the judge. Maricopa County typically sets an early Resolution Management Conference, where the judge identifies the contested issues, sets deadlines, and may order mediation.
  7. Mediate through Conciliation Services or a private mediator. Some Custody cases settle at this stage. An agreement you reach, once the court approves it, becomes an enforceable order, and it lets you keep control of your family’s schedule instead of leaving it to a judge.
  8. Evaluations and the child’s voice, if needed. In higher-conflict cases, the court may order a custody evaluation, appoint a best interests attorney, or interview the child (A.R.S. §§ 25-405 and 25-406)
  9. Disclosure and trial preparation. Both sides exchange documents, identify witnesses, and file pretrial statements. This is where a well-organized case can make a real difference.
  10. Evidentiary hearing (trial). If the parents can’t agree, the judge hears testimony, applies the § 25-403 best-interests factors, and issues final orders, including a parenting plan (A.R.S. § 25-403.02).
  11. Life after the order. Orders can be enforced if a parent doesn’t follow them and modified when circumstances change.

Changing an Existing Custody Order in Arizona

Children grow and circumstances change, and Arizona law allows for that within limits.

  • Modifications (A.R.S. § 25-411): You generally can’t ask to change legal decision-making within one year of the last order unless your child’s current environment may seriously endanger their physical, mental, moral, or emotional health. After that, you must show a material change in circumstances affecting the child’s welfare. The court may modify parenting time whenever doing so would serve the child’s best interests.
  • Relocation (A.R.S. § 25-408): If both parents live in Arizona and share legal decision-making or parenting time under a written agreement or court order, a parent who wants to move out of state or more than 100 miles within Arizona must generally give the other parent 45 days’ written notice. The other parent can petition the court to stop the move, and the parent who wants to relocate has to show that the move is in the child’s best interests.
  • Grandparents and third parties (A.R.S. § 25-409): In certain circumstances, grandparents and others who have stood in a parent’s role may seek visitation or legal decision-making.

Why Work With a Child Custody Lawyer in Arizona Who Focuses Only on Family Law

  • 100% family law. We don’t handle personal injury or criminal cases on the side. Family law is all we do.
  • Honest, realistic advice. We tell you what outcomes are realistic under Arizona law, even when it’s not what you hoped to hear, so you can make decisions with clear eyes.
  • A boutique firm with personal attention. You’ll know your legal team, and your team will know your case.
  • Payment plans and flat-fee options. Quality representation shouldn’t be out of reach for families in transition.

A Word of Advice From Our Office

Keep your children out of the conflict. Don’t ask them to carry messages, don’t discuss the case in front of them, and don’t speak negatively about the other parent. Judges notice, and more importantly, so do your kids. Whenever it’s safe and realistic, we try to negotiate first, because an agreement you help shape is almost always better for your family than one imposed on you. When negotiation isn’t possible, we’re prepared to go to court.